There is a growing debate at Seattle City Hall over public safety, and residents have every right to demand answers. But before city leaders point fingers at Mayor Katie Wilson, we should take a step back and look at the timeline.
Seattle’s public-safety problems did not begin when Wilson took office in January 2026. Many of the problems now being discussed — particularly in North Seattle and along Aurora Avenue — existed under previous administrations and previous City Councils.
That matters when we talk about accountability.
District 5 is a particularly important example. Today, District 5 is represented by Councilmember Debora Juarez, who was appointed in July 2025 to fill the vacancy created by Cathy Moore’s resignation. Juarez’s term runs through November 2026, when voters will choose who completes the remainder of the term. Juarez previously served from 2015 to 2023. In Q1 of 2019 alone District 5 had the following 93 aggravated assaults, 336 simple assaults, 4 murders, 19 forcible rapes, and 151 burglaries. North Aurora's drug trade, sex trafficking and fencing of stolen Home depot goods were all unopposed and the standard during Juarez's tenor.
The citizens of District 5 crime and public-safety concerns in North Seattle certainly did not suddenly appear in 2026.
The city itself has acknowledged the serious problems surrounding north Aurora Avenue, including shootings and open prostitution. In June, the City Council and Mayor Wilson’s administration jointly announced actions intended to address the violence.
So here is the question Seattle residents should be asking:
If these problems existed before Mayor Wilson took office, why is the conversation being framed as though she created them?
Holding a new mayor accountable for what happens on her watch is fair. That is part of the job. But accountability should not become historical amnesia.
If a neighborhood has experienced years of public-safety problems, residents deserve to know what previous city leaders did, what they failed to do, what resources were available, and which policies were supported or opposed by the elected officials representing that neighborhood.
And that includes District 5.
Council member Juarez has publicly made public safety along Aurora Avenue a priority. Her office has announced actions addressing the violence, and she has called for additional measures following subsequent shootings. Why didn't she care from 2015 to 2023?
That raises a legitimate question about shared responsibility.
Where was the urgency before the current mayor took office?
This isn't an argument that Mayor Wilson should get a free pass. She shouldn't. If crime continues, residents should expect measurable results from the mayor, the police department, the City Attorney, and the City Council.
But the same standard should apply to everyone.
The City Council is not a bystander. Council members write and vote on legislation, approve budgets, set policy priorities and represent specific neighborhoods. District council members, in particular, have a responsibility to listen to the residents who elected them and advocate for their communities.
That means we shouldn't reduce a complicated, years-long public-safety problem to a political talking point about a mayor who has been in office for only a matter of months.
Seattle deserves better than that.
Residents deserve a serious accounting of what has happened in District 5 over the past several years — including crime trends, police staffing, prosecutions, funding, neighborhood complaints, Council actions and the decisions made by the elected officials representing the district.
Then we can have an honest conversation about what Mayor Wilson is responsible for.
And what everyone else is responsible for.
Because if Seattle wants safer neighborhoods, the goal shouldn't be finding the easiest person to blame.
The goal should be figuring out what actually went wrong, who had the authority to fix it, what was tried, what failed, and what needs to happen next.
That is the accountability Seattle residents deserve.